• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle

  • The fact that it’s more difficult to see someone in front of you when your hood is 6 feet up probably has a lot to do with it too. Takes longer to stop a heavier vehicle too.

    Commercial driving licenses exist to ensure there’s additional training for people driving a large vehicles. But there’s no additional training needed for driving massive pickup trucks.

    I don’t like my chances as a pedestrian getting hit by even a Honda Civic. But I think someone driving a Civic is more likely to see me and stop their car before hitting me than someone driving a lifted F-350.



  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.catoData is Beautiful@mander.xyzdeadly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, so have you dug into the stats to find out the percentage of those people that are dying from heart disease that are over 70?

    Also what is considered an article about terrorism? If the NYT mentions 9/11 in one sentence in an article does that become an article about people dying of terrorism?

    The methodology of gathering and compiling data in statistics is relevant, and that’s before we get into analysis.

    As Mark Twain said, “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” This graph is likely way more biased than the implied accusation of bias leveled on the NYT could ever be.


  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.catoData is Beautiful@mander.xyzdeadly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Having family members die of these things doesn’t make people aware heart disease exist? It’s only if it’s reported in the New York Times reports on it that makes people aware of things?

    And no it’s not all that flashy when my grandfather dies of a heart attack at the age of 87. That’s part of your stats on the common causes of death, right? It’s sad for those that knew him, but do you expect a story about an octogenarian dying of a heart attack to make the front page of the NY Times? What would that accomplish more than an obituary stating people should give to a charity in lieu of flowers? Maybe with some more funding to medical research my grandfather could’ve lived to 88 or 89! But the damn NY Times decided it was more important to report on someone dying in the prime of their life instead of elderly people dying. Those insensitive bastards!


  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.catoData is Beautiful@mander.xyzdeadly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve had various family members die from all of the most common things in the top 2/3 of the causes of death. It sucks. But I wouldn’t want there to be a story about it in the NY Times about it… because why would they do that?

    They’re journalists not doctors, treating heart disease and cancer isn’t their jobs and it’s not all that interesting to write about.


  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.catoFediverse@lemmy.worldBluesky just verified ICE
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s just all emotion and no rational thought now. People just go into outrage mode when certain topics are mentioned.

    Really it opens a channel to criticize ICE without needing to logon to X to do so. But that’s bad because preventing communication is good?

    Of course I doubt ICE will care about criticism directed towards their account on bluesky. But that means things said on the internet don’t have much of an effect on things, which means it doesn’t matter whether they’re on bluesky (or any other forum).

    Mostly it’s about some weird belief by some about controlling what is being said on the internet gains power. You’d think the events that have happened would have proven this wrong, but still people continue to be upset about things being said on the internet and want some power over those things.

    Really words on the internet don’t matter as much as people think, and the idea of blocking unwanted information is annoying at best and can lead to ignorance. What matters is the horrible acts ICE is doing. We should want more light being shown on them, and welcome any potential channel of discussion.

    Wanting to prevent discussion indicates you feel you’re in the wrong. ICE is indicating they want discussion, while those that are outraged by ICE being on bluesky are indicating they don’t want discussion on ICE. Why would anyone want to make is seem ICE is in the right while they’re in the wrong? It’s people not thinking and only reacting emotionally and handing ICE a W because they are raging instead of thinking.