It’s garbage.

The laundry list of items is nothing more than the usual “be active, don’t drink, don’t smoke, reduce your stress, etc, etc”, with no data, no quantification, etc.

100% eh?

This is all old news, I was hoping for a lot more.

For “three years” of poring over Stasi docs, this is little more than we knew in 1989.

It’s like he stopped writing just as he was gaining momentum.

Your ignorance is astounding.

How about neither?

No, just this thought belongs in Shower Thoughts.

This “Nobel Laureate” needs to check his hubris and condescension.

No shit? 🤦

Small platforms are excluded today

Today

TL:DR

Just another name to mute.

Here are my notes

No, shockingly bad news to continue to require third party attestation of my device.

This is to just get people used to the idea, to normalize it outside Google and Apple, and to then push it into PC OS’s.

Having worked with lots of dogs (including obedience trials) - the #1 indicator of dog behaviour is the dog’s human.

And BP meds are known to cause things like arrhythmia and kidney failure.

Fuck you.

And I bet it really only applies to the really bad diets.

I’ve read a LOT about cardiovascular studies (along with diabetes) because they’re both in my family - bottom line is genetics is the primary driver for cardiovascular disease, and no one wants to acknowledge it.

Diet and exercise can make a difference if your disease is caused by… (bad) diet and (lack of) exercise - which is a small fraction of people.

We’ve seen Olympic athletes - runners notably - with significant cardiovascular issues. Clearly it wasn’t caused by a lack of exercise, and I really doubt their diet was the cause.

So they admit most don’t?

PWA app only is a big no sale.

As much as I dislike dedicated apps for things that don’t need it, THIS is something that needs it.

Not just diabetes - glucose instability (whether spikes or lows) are hugely influential to all sorts of disease processes, and is likely a major cause of coronary issues in the last 40 years (since the start of low-fat nonsense in the 80’s).

Or… These are very different places with different constraints.

For example, the US is comprised of 50 states - construction has to meet federal, state, county, municipality codes, and then any federal or state agencies that have a say on construction possibly affecting water ways, natural habitat, etc.

The bureaucratic process is staggering.

And municipalities change their minds every day the wind blows (and who is paying them off).

So it’s a problem of bureaucracy and graft.

Was dimensional lumber available then?

Seems like most would use lumber as-is, not spend the effort to make it dimensional.

Seems like this would be more southwest with the brick - making brick is a time and fuel- consuming process.

How common was this design in the 1800’s on the prairie as shown here? Everything I’ve read shows much simpler design for prairie homes, with things like brick in cities.