Ukraine has assassinated high commabd in Moscow before, and more than once. They’re especially focused on those involved in crime and terror against civilians, but also high command in general.

There’s Russians sabotaging Russia as well, cooperating with Ukraine. If it’s a package, could be an unbeknownst delivery.

Very unlikely this is false flag. This makes Russia look weak. For a false flag, if the target is publicity and the public, they’d go for public and symbolic with civilian casualties. This pushes fear and uncertainty into their command stricture. It weakens them.

That’s crazy. The video shows one scene where you can see the big city not far off, and they shoot it down before it is able to do damage. Impressive imagery.

The Russian company doesn’t. Sure.

Supposedly you could test the aluminium that landed in Ukraine against theirs. That’ll be more interesting.

Wildberries is the largest Russian online retailer - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildberries

Around the time of the 22 July attack, body armour, drone parts, and military gear were listed on the website for sale.

It’s not about wild berries after all.

Are you saying something in the article is wrong or just linking to an alternative bike?

/edit: ubco is New Zealand so just established alternative.

You don’t expect a lot of sunflowers on a sunflower field?

wow, that high kick (in the last video)

You think that’s one of multiple reasons, or the sole reason?

Russia still spouts the “they’re Nazis” nonsense in all kinds of directions. Do you think those are correct too?

In what timeframe?

Next: Chameleon cars. Or maybe not. Russia doesn’t have the money or tech for it.

Did that go through? Last I heard Putin/Russia did not follow through with that POW exchange. Zelensky followed with it is the responsibility of the USA to make sure it goes through, given that they guaranteed it to Ukraine in the negotiations.

Have you seen images of the last hits? The fire is/was crazy.

Jake update video timestamped link

If you’re saying I can go to youtube

Dunno what you mean. It’s a good documentary, an on-location report. If you’re not interested in that, in general or video form, you don’t have to watch it. That’s how it is on a community platform of varying posts and media.

The quote is from their video description. It’s not a transcript.

He’s made a video documentary about the human safari before. He’s one of the reasons why people are aware of it.

In this report he gives an update on the situation. There are still people there who don’t leave. And the scale and locations of focus changed.

How can you talk about peace and [keep] attacking people, and knowing that people are freezing?

Russia isn’t talking about peace.

The (obvious) hyprocricy is on the US that accept and disregard the whole situation while doing corruption talks in private and peace talk publicity.

Sadly, the EU does not take decisive action either, in the face of Russia’s continued terrorism and Ukraine’s human crisis.

The IFV is protected against 30 mm projectiles in the frontal projection and 14.5 mm rounds from the sides. The vehicle’s floor provides protection against an explosion equivalent to 10 kg of TNT.

I feel like specs nowadays, and specifically when related to Ukraine, should include meaningful drone/explosives resilience. But I guess they don’t say anything about anti-tank projectiles either.

Adding context: I was not very familiar with it, but the article mentions it in the last three paragraphs, and links to a more elaborate, interesting article.

You say Russia has air superiority, but Ukraine uses jets every night to destroy incoming missiles and drones. Every night, Ukraine strikes Russia across the border and deep into Russia. Can you elaborate on what you mean by air superiority?

Ukraine uses fiber-optic cable FPV with 50 km reach, and hit targets deep inside Russia. Can you elaborate how Russia “has a huge edge in fiberoptics drones”? What do they have that is so much better?

Would be interesting to see how the numbers compare to today.

A study of studies is a better source than a single study.