Refusing to reduce complex reality into slogans and clichés since 19XX

  • 0 Posts
  • 42 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 5th, 2026

help-circle







  • I didn’t claim it’s badly built - but it’s typically unmaintained, with outdated doors and windows that leak heat and draft, old plumbing that’s prone to leaks and low pressure, dangerous electrics that haven’t been updated in decades, unhealthy old building materials that off-gas or contain asbestos or other hazards, and almost definitely poor air quality due to mold, moisture problems, and inadequate ventilation. We have houses like that in Finland too - and rather often they’re abandoned and/or for sale basically for the price of the plot, because the cost of bringing them up to modern standards exceeds what anyone is willing to pay for the building itself.

    I’m not saying all houses in Russia are like that but throw a dart on a map of Russia and go see the houses there and it’s going to be one of these ones.



  • You used the term predetermined there so I just want to note to others that no-free-will doesn’t imply fatalism. It’s not that whatever was going to happen is going to happen anyway whether you do anything about it or not. That would imply cause without an action and it’s the exact opposite of what the idea of no-free-will in a deterministic universe means.

    Determinism is about everything following from past events and the state of the universe at that specific moment and that the ability to have done otherwise is an illusion. So you didn’t grab a chocolate bar at the checkout because it was predetermined at your time of birth that this would happen but you also didn’t grab it because that’s what you chose to do there and then and you could’ve also chosen not to grab it. No - you couldn’t have. You didn’t choose to be hungry, you didn’t choose to notice the chocolate bar there, you didn’t choose to like Snickers more than Twix and so on. Everything that ultimately led to you grabbing that specific chocolate bar was outside of your control and the fact that you did grab it means that if we rewind the universe back to that same moment, everything else being equal, you’ll just grab it again, and again, and again. How could you not grab it? That’s like saying 4 + 4 is 8 but it could also be 6. No it can’t. It’s always going to produce the same result no matter how many times you run the calculation.

    We do things for two reasons: either you want to or you have to. There’s obviously no freedom in having to do something but you’re not free to choose your wants either.



  • Choosing to filter out content from your social media feed isn’t necessarily about denial or apathy. For many people, it’s a conscious decision to preserve their mental clarity and avoid being constantly pulled into emotionally charged, tribal, or manipulative discourse. Being well-informed doesn’t require immersing yourself in an endless stream of outrage, nor does stepping back from that mean you’re turning a blind eye to anything.

    There’s a difference between ignoring reality and choosing how and when to engage with it. Most of what passes for “news” online isn’t a sober presentation of facts or ideas - it’s performance, manufactured outrage, and algorithm-driven noise. If someone wants to stay sane and focus on things they can actually influence in their immediate life, I don’t see that as sticking their head in the sand. I see it as setting healhy boundaries in an environment that’s often designed to provoke rather than inform.

    People aren’t morally obligated to be constantly exposed to negativity just to prove they care. In fact, thoughtful action tends to come from those who can step back from the noise and think clearly, not from those who are perpetually consumed by it.