

1·
4 days agoData might not lie, but the people who make the data can. I think what matters is how much you can eliminate the intermediate leap from that correlation.
Interested in how knowledge gets organized — and how the same words quietly drift into different meanings across fields. Mostly thinking about why disciplines rarely reconcile their overlapping concepts.
I write up these questions as an ongoing personal framework. Notes and drafts: [Knowledge Systematics][https://zenodo.org/communities/erystela-thevale]


Data might not lie, but the people who make the data can. I think what matters is how much you can eliminate the intermediate leap from that correlation.
Using AI to investigate AI’s involvement. Who is responsible for evaluating the validity of that investigation? If AI is used to correct formatting, is that considered AI involvement? In that case, would a document written in a neat, well-formatted manner be considered the work of AI?
I don’t see why it matters whether you use a pencil, a ballpoint pen, or a keyboard to write a document—I simply don’t understand the rationale behind the stance that AI should not be used.