I had to trim my screenshots due to being a mod elsewhere, so I can see mod names. I think the screenshot of the interaction really sums this one up. I initially commented after a brief skim of the article, basically enough time to figure out that it wasn’t spewing great replacement bullshit, and then gave a little reminder that ecofascism is real and uses language such as “humans are parasites”.
OP responded with a suspicious comment, and another comment pointed out the author’s true intent, so I went looking deeper. At the very last part of the article, like 3rd to last sentence in the last paragraph, the author calls for a “non-coerceive” means to kill 70% of the human race. I called it out, and was banned.
What are you talking about? There’s no rule 0 in that comm
Read the sidebar.
This isn’t a soap/c/, this is an arbitration /c/.
I know what this comm is for, and I read the sidebar in every comm I want to post in. What about this makes you think it isn’t appropriate?
This is a loose structure. For the most part, I followed it.
On points 1 and 3, I didn’t de-obfuscate. I added obfuscation, to reduce the brigading that still happened, because we’re dealing with a fascist in our space here. On point 5, there is not much to remedy unless the mod is removed.
Edit: ok, it really bothers me that you’re getting pissy about point 3. I explicitly explained why I edited the screenshot. Literally first sentence.
I wouldn’t fault someone for hiding the mods name, even if it isn’t much of a secret.