To paraphrase my removed comment: anything is trolling if you manipulate the definition to include speech you don’t like.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    It’s dishonest to claim to state an imaginary scenario as fact. There’s not much reason for me to believe that the dems wouldn’t have attacked Iran too. Genocide Joe and Kamalacaust spent their last days pathetically serving zionism.

    And abortion… It’s a “wedge issue” that benefits both parties. Dems could have solved it many times but they never do, like almost every issue.

    So I might agree with removing the comment since it’s the same tired and imaginary BS.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      There’s not much reason for me to believe that the dems wouldn’t have attacked Iran too.

      I see this claim so often, yet there’s never any evidence they were telegraphing aggression while they were trying to revive the JCPOA.

      This is just cope.