“Oooh they used AI, fuck them” is mostly a stance taken by people who weren’t ever going to engage with the papers as is. The only reason these people are concerned about this is because “oooo AI bad bad bad”.
I swear, there’s no difference between these folks and the “all natural, herbal” hippies. Total lack of scientific temperament, total lack of nuance. No intention of getting to the truth. Just screaming what their perceived “ideological team” has to say about this. Just like the Bible thumpers they claim to despise.
Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and correctness of their work. What tools they use is no concern of mine.
Thank you.
“Oooh they used AI, fuck them” is mostly a stance taken by people who weren’t ever going to engage with the papers as is. The only reason these people are concerned about this is because “oooo AI bad bad bad”.
I swear, there’s no difference between these folks and the “all natural, herbal” hippies. Total lack of scientific temperament, total lack of nuance. No intention of getting to the truth. Just screaming what their perceived “ideological team” has to say about this. Just like the Bible thumpers they claim to despise.