Valuy@lemmy.zip to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoSurge in fake citations uncovered by audit of 2.5 million biomedical science paperswww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down11
arrow-up1120arrow-down1external-linkSurge in fake citations uncovered by audit of 2.5 million biomedical science paperswww.nature.comValuy@lemmy.zip to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squarebonenode@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareGsus4@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 months agoFunny you should say that, because neither authors nor reviewers get paid.
minus-squareGsus4@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoIt is a case where the “greed is good” neoliberal mantra works in the stupidest way possible, especially in the age of self publishing.
minus-squareThomasWilliams@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoMore papers = more pay. The researchers don’t work for free either.
minus-squareGsus4@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoMaybe in academia. Maybe. Papers will only get you so far at one stage in your academic career. Things change once you move up the ladder.
deleted by creator
Funny you should say that, because neither authors nor reviewers get paid.
deleted by creator
It is a case where the “greed is good” neoliberal mantra works in the stupidest way possible, especially in the age of self publishing.
More papers = more pay.
The researchers don’t work for free either.
Maybe in academia. Maybe. Papers will only get you so far at one stage in your academic career. Things change once you move up the ladder.