RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Map Enthusiasts@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 8 days agoPornhub Valentine's Day searches by US statesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1344arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up1328arrow-down1imagePornhub Valentine's Day searches by US statesh.itjust.worksRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Map Enthusiasts@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square130fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareeverett@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 days agoYou’ll find your answer in the gray text above the map.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 days agoNo, no I wouldn’t. “More often” could be by one search in a total set of 1,000,000, which basically is never going to be statistically significant - it could just be random chance, and not an actual trend. That goes in both absolute and relative terms.
You’ll find your answer in the gray text above the map.
No, no I wouldn’t.
“More often” could be by one search in a total set of 1,000,000, which basically is never going to be statistically significant - it could just be random chance, and not an actual trend. That goes in both absolute and relative terms.