This cannot possibly hold up in court. You cant just advertise a product and then be like “*but actually we might be lying about some or all of these things”??? What the fuck are you selling then

  • Cattail@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 个月前

    or we can simply apply false advertising if the ai gets something wrong, like how that lawyer that disbarred for using ai to write his court papers and cited a case that never happened

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 个月前

      Yeah, when the other commenters mentioned consumer protection laws, they meant that it would be a case of false advertising.

      There’s also been a similar case before, where Air Canada got sued, because their chatbot promised to a customer that he could apply for one of their bonus programs after the flight, which then got denied by Air Canada: https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/techlex/moffatt-v-air-canada-misrepresentation-ai-chatbot

      In that particular case, it might have helped, if the chatbot had a disclaimer that it’s lying, but only because Air Canada provided the truthful information elsewhere on their webpage. That’s not gonna be the case for such product descriptions…