• Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I went into the article not having any clue that “saddle pain” is a euphemism.

    Progressing from 200 to 400 and finally 600 kilometres, Williams started to experience what she described as “abrasion” of her labia.

    • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Do women wear underpants when riding? I know guys don’t but were less vulnerable to that kind of…abrasion. Surely a pair of low friction underwear would combat that…abrasion.

          • blackbeards_bounty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Underwear is not for padding. I suspected my insistence on wearing both wasn’t a “real” cyclists’ choice, but this comment is first confirmation I’ve seen of that.

            Your shorts must be nasty.

            • horse@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The reason for not wearing underwear is that it can cause chafing or pressure points where it shifts or creases. Cycling shorts are designed to minimise that by not doing either. There is nothing nasty about cycling shorts if you wash them after each ride. If anything they handle sweat better than cotton underwear would.

              That being said, if you feel better wearing underwear, then you should feel free to do so. But there are practical reasons why most people don’t and they don’t have anything to do with trying to be a “real cyclist”.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pro cyclists use padded chamois, and creme embrocations. Tour de France is 2200 miles and no one needed different saddles.

  • GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nothing new, I have a seat that uses squares cushioned pads instead of these elongated ones.

    The general concept is awesome, but not truly a invention, already invented.

    Only problem is plastic will break, after a while, shorter than traditional seats.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I solve this by not going far on the bike, but a wide seat slightly tilted down is working well for me on the electric bike. On an endurance racing bike I don’t understand how anyone can stand the seats for that long, most bike seats seem almost intentionally designed to be uncomfortable.

    • horse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      A well fitting road bike saddle is designed to have you sitting on your seat bones, rather than your soft tissue, often with a cutout in the middle to relieve pressure from the genital area. This is much more comfortable on long rides. The padding is minimal, since you are expected to wear padded shorts to minimise friction. Some people also use chamois cream to further reduce chafing, although I personally don’t find this to be all that necessary and only really use it on longer rides, if at all. This setup is much more comfortable if you’re going to spend long hours in the saddle, especially if you do it regularly and your butt is used to it.

      Like with most bike parts, saddles come in all different shapes and sizes and different types make sense for different types of riding.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      A good fitting saddle + high quality padded biking shorts will go a long way to mitigate this issue.

      The pros all get bike fits for even better results

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hardened (pun intended) cyclists will tell you that this is normal, because sit bones blah blah etc, but I think you’re right. The real reason seasoned cyclists have no issue with washboard saddles is that they use them every day and their butts have become conditioned (read: numb) to them. The simplest explanation is usually the best.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Fair. So I will fall back on a better source: my butt. A few years ago I rented an expensive razor-saddled racing bike for a few days. The gluteal agony of those few days I remember better than the actual cycling. Never again.

          • kugel7c@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The thing is if you would’ve stuck with that setup for a month or 2 (assuming a not overweight person, and the saddle being correctly sized/ the whole bike fit being correctish ) the agony would have most likely subsided. And it likely wouldn’t have existed if you had built up/ trained yourself to it in smaller steps. Starting with rides as short as 15min.

            It’s almost like saying running 10km is impossible after your first run in years. Or hitting the bullseye in dart is impossible after your first game. The saddle requires training. The position and movements on the bike require training. Because if not trained your body will be sore, if you overdo it.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, sure, that was my point. The most uncomfortable shoes are usually fine once you’ve worn them in. But the non-washboard saddle on my e-bike was not uncomfortable to start with. It didn’t hurt after the first 3 hours and it doesn’t hurt 1500km later.

              • kugel7c@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Unlike uncomfortable shoes the saddles have a point, not chafing/ allowing for the pedalling movement while also supporting part of the riders weight.

                Wide/cushiony saddles prioritize comfort of the latter point over the former. They will support more of the riders weight more comfortably, while neglecting the comfort of the movements of the rider. So on shorter and easier rides the cushion saddle is fine, the longer you go the more such a saddle will cause discomfort.

                If your saddle works for you by God keep using it, im just trying to explain why other people use different ones.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re more expensive, but recumbents do already solve this problem.

    Would still like to try an alternative to saddles on regular bikes though.

    • rollerbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m itching to try them but I suspect that lying down would come with it’s own set of problems.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        With recumbent two-wheelers, there’s a small bit of awkwardness maintaining balance as you go from a stop to a start. Other than that, the only real issue is that you can’t stand up when you’re riding up hills. All you can do is drop the gear and keep pedaling.

        Personally I think it’s well worth the issues they solve, trikes especially. They’re much more comfortable. The trikes are much more resilient to bursts of wind, and the stability makes them much better for winter riding.

        • limelight79@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          …the stability makes them much better for winter riding.

          I’m curious what you mean by this. I ride (a regular bike) outdoors year round, and other than the clothing and the sense of “Why am I doing this?”, there’s not really much different. But I’m not riding in snow or other weather, so maybe that’s what you are referring to.

          • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Snow, ice, and high winds are mainly what I’m referring to. A big enough gust from the wrong angle can pretty easily throw you off a bike, or send it veering in the wrong direction briefly at least (not to mention the struggle against headwinds).

            Snow is one problem, but ice is the worst. I’ve used everything from studded tires to fat tire bikes, and they all have the same problem: two-wheeled vehicles want to fall down. A recumbent trike on the other hand is much closer to the ground, and stays upright by default. It virtually solves all of the aforementioned problems, while also being much more comfortable to sit on.

              • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                The advantage that even a regular tricycle has over a bicycle is that it can remain upright on its own. A bike wants to fall, and that continues to be a problem no matter how good your traction is on ice, because even the smallest slip sends you straight to the ground.

                The disadvantage of trikes is that they are generally very slow and cumbersome. Some bikes can feel like a real slog to try to commute on.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    huh? i have never heard anyone complain about this unless they’re using a sports saddle, which… yeah no shit? get a normal saddle.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Clearly you have no idea what it is like to have each cheek independently supported. I bet you could even use this saddle to collect the extra energy generated by your cheeks. This cheek energy could then be wirelessly transmitted back to powerbanks. Our entire society could be powered purely by the massive cheek energy of billions of bikers.

      • GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        “I bet you could even use this saddle to collect the extra energy generated by your cheeks. This cheek energy could then be wirelessly transmitted back to powerbanks. Our entire society could be powered purely by the massive cheek energy of billions of bikers.”

        LOL, as a bicyclist that uses such a type of seat, I thought you were serious & talking about powering something the cyclist is using-have on him. I can see that being the next innovation to these type of seats.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I am sure you could also use this energy to power the peripherals connected to your bike as well.

          My stance is this energy should be used for the good of society. This ass energy could be collected for the benefit of mankind.

          Imagine billions of cheeks working together to power our industry. This is the type of energy revolution we desperately need!